One of the books I have on my work desk is The Well-Spoken Thesaurus. It's a great way to think outside of your normal patterns and give your manuscript a bit of flair.
It's not a typical thesaurus where you look up the word and you get a litany of words to substitute. It includes phrasing, which can be just as important as not repeating the same words over and over.
One example:
His ___ were like a ____
His ____ were the____ of a ___
Example: The skin of his wrinkled brown face had a dry and scaly look; his hands were the hands of a crocodile. His movements were marked by the lizard's disconcertingly abrupt clockwork speed; his speech was thin, fluty, and dry. (Aldous Huxley, Chrome Yellow)
See how more you as the reader get from "his hands were the hands of a crocodile" as opposed to "his hands were like a crocodile's" (which is better than "his hands were dry and scaly").
Another example:
Persuade - prevail upon, strike a sympathetic chord, or cajole
Persuade not to - dissuade
Persuade to speak - draw him out
Persuaded me to - moved me to
And possibly a more useful example:
Said - expressed, indicated, remarked, made clear that, said with a touch of, issued a statement, said with a quiver of, implored, broke into the conversation, gave full expression to, an irreverent voice put in, put it to her, articulated, dropped her voice mournfully, she went on, she went off into a, as murmurs seeped through the pews, declared, drawled out the word, couched in terms of, put it to him squarely, addressed some remark to him.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Sunday, April 28, 2013
2013 Goals - Revisited
I'm posting over on the EFA blog to talk about my 2013 goals. Check it out.
How are you doing on your goals this year?
How are you doing on your goals this year?
Thursday, April 18, 2013
Don't Meddle With My Mettle
It's not often I see either meddle or mettle in a manuscript, although I sometimes do see the occasional medal.
Mettle is defined as the courage to go on. It often gets tested in battle.
Meddle is what your best friend does when she tries to fix you up on a blind date. Or, you can also think of the most popular verison of meddling:
{I just had a flashback to when my son was younger and could watch Scooby Doo all day (and all night!)}
So, when in doubt, ask yourself: is my character engaging in Scooby Doo and the gang behavior by meddling in something? Or is my character filled with determination and courage to continue her quest?
Mettle is defined as the courage to go on. It often gets tested in battle.
Meddle is what your best friend does when she tries to fix you up on a blind date. Or, you can also think of the most popular verison of meddling:
{I just had a flashback to when my son was younger and could watch Scooby Doo all day (and all night!)}
So, when in doubt, ask yourself: is my character engaging in Scooby Doo and the gang behavior by meddling in something? Or is my character filled with determination and courage to continue her quest?
Thursday, April 11, 2013
Friday, April 5, 2013
Thoughts On Reviews
I recently had an author call me to talk about his reviews on Amazon. He's gotten several reviews on his three books, mostly positive. But there's always someone who wants to spoil the party, so he has some lower reviews as well.
He was thinking of stopping his current series and starting a new one, all based on the comments in the reviews. My advice to him: DON'T.
1) Not every book will appeal to every reader. Sad, but true: your book, no matter how much you worked on it, no matter how much of your heart and soul you put into it, no matter how much you worked, edited, re-worked, and edited some more will still not be for everyone. Think of the classics, traditional or new: The Odyssey, Shakespeare, Moby Dick, Anne of Green Gables, Pride and Prejudice, Stephen King, and more - they have reviews and ratings that run the gamut.
2) The strength and impact of the review matters. Does the review say something to the effect of: I hate (your genre) and this book sucked? Did the review actually point out inconsistencies, grammar issues (heavens, no!), provide issues that you could logically discuss? Or was it basically a rant, offering a personal opinion? There's practically nothing you can do to change a person's opinion about something, so why waste your time stewing over it?
3) Some people are mean. You know who they are in your real life, and how toavoid deal with them. But online, you can't employ the same methods. Responding will generally get you more trouble than you started with and could end up consuming your energy - not a good place to be. Accept that some people enjoy pointing out the perceived flaws and failings; choose to be someone who enjoys letting stuff like that go.
4) Realize that readers make up their own minds. Personally, I don't put much stock in any review online. I'm a little judge-y on how the review itself is written (please, dear God, save me from reviews written in all caps or in text-speak!). I look at the overall numbers and if there are more one- and two-star reviews than the others, I'll take a peek at what those say. I had another author share that she particularly appreciated a one-star review from someone who NEVER READ THE BOOK (insert your own sarcastic tone here). Reviews like that get tossed out of my mind and almost have the opposite effect - I'll read the book just to prove them wrong!
I'd like to leave you with this final thought: as an author, you have worked hard to put out a piece of art. Art is subjective; there will be no two people who get the exact same thing out of it. But that's ok. You didn't really do it for them, did you? You did it to get rid of those voices in your head (really, once they start telling you what to have for breakfast, that's when you should see the head-shrinker!); you did it to explore an issue; you did it to create a new world and answer the question what if? And you should be proud of it. After all, not everyone has the talent and drive to do that (me included!)
He was thinking of stopping his current series and starting a new one, all based on the comments in the reviews. My advice to him: DON'T.
1) Not every book will appeal to every reader. Sad, but true: your book, no matter how much you worked on it, no matter how much of your heart and soul you put into it, no matter how much you worked, edited, re-worked, and edited some more will still not be for everyone. Think of the classics, traditional or new: The Odyssey, Shakespeare, Moby Dick, Anne of Green Gables, Pride and Prejudice, Stephen King, and more - they have reviews and ratings that run the gamut.
2) The strength and impact of the review matters. Does the review say something to the effect of: I hate (your genre) and this book sucked? Did the review actually point out inconsistencies, grammar issues (heavens, no!), provide issues that you could logically discuss? Or was it basically a rant, offering a personal opinion? There's practically nothing you can do to change a person's opinion about something, so why waste your time stewing over it?
3) Some people are mean. You know who they are in your real life, and how to
4) Realize that readers make up their own minds. Personally, I don't put much stock in any review online. I'm a little judge-y on how the review itself is written (please, dear God, save me from reviews written in all caps or in text-speak!). I look at the overall numbers and if there are more one- and two-star reviews than the others, I'll take a peek at what those say. I had another author share that she particularly appreciated a one-star review from someone who NEVER READ THE BOOK (insert your own sarcastic tone here). Reviews like that get tossed out of my mind and almost have the opposite effect - I'll read the book just to prove them wrong!
I'd like to leave you with this final thought: as an author, you have worked hard to put out a piece of art. Art is subjective; there will be no two people who get the exact same thing out of it. But that's ok. You didn't really do it for them, did you? You did it to get rid of those voices in your head (really, once they start telling you what to have for breakfast, that's when you should see the head-shrinker!); you did it to explore an issue; you did it to create a new world and answer the question what if? And you should be proud of it. After all, not everyone has the talent and drive to do that (me included!)
Monday, April 1, 2013
Author Interview - Edward Coburn
Let's welcome this month's author, Edward Coburn. He's writing a series (The Dog Who Ate the ???), a twenty-six title series that focuses on Adam, a physic "finder" living in a small town, as well as The Last Killer Standing.
1) What
were your favorite books growing up? In grade school and junior high,
I’d probably say SciFi, though I did read a bit of Tarzan as well. In high
school I read mostly sports books where the star was in high school and, of
course, he got the girl. Later I read most anything: SciFi, adventure, and
detective.
2) Now
that you have, let’s say—some life experience, what would you tell your younger
self? Get serious about something and
really try to do your best and not waste so darn much time.
3) Describe
your typical day. Unfortunately I leave for word at
the DMV (I am a computer programmer) at 7:00 and my day starts at 7:30. At
breaks and lunch, I try to make a few notes to work with in the evening (we’re
not allowed to use our work computer for anything personal and also not allowed
to bring any computer devices on site such as laptops). Sometimes I run to the
library for research or using one of their computers. I leave for home at 4:30,
get home at 5:00, supper and then work for a couple of hours. Then a couple
hours of TV with the wife. I’d really rather write then, too, but domestic
tranquility trumps writing.
4) Who
is your favorite character in your books? I’d have to say Adam in my series
The Dog Who Ate The ???. He is psychic and rich, two things I wish I was. His
psychic dog, Bagel the beagle, is fun as well.
5) What
do you do when writer’s block shows up, settles in, and makes itself
comfortable? I’d have to say writer’s block is
really not an issue with me; writer’s laziness is, however. It seems that I am
never short of ideas but, sometimes, I just don’t feel like writing (especially
after programming for eight hours).
6) Do
you find yourself pulling details from “real life” or does your imagination
rule the roost? I use a bit of real life, but most
of my ideas come from movies, TV, reading, and listening to books on tape while
driving to and from work. I have a very fertile imagination and many times a
word or two a character somewhere says will launch an idea. I wrote an entire
book (The Last Killer Standing) from
an idea for the title of a book. I thought the book would be about something;
it wasn’t, but the idea was so good, I used it to write the book.
7) What
was the first manuscript you wrote (even if it never saw the light of day)? I wrote a book called “Sky Search
to Turon,” a SciFi book that I don’t remember much about but I do remember it
had something to do with Acid wars. The interesting thing is I read a book
years later in which there were Acid wars.
8) Have
you ever pursued traditional publishing? Or did you go straight for indie
publishing? For many years but, honestly, I
think it’s a good thing they weren’t interested. Especially in today’s
publishing world. They would have to offer me a lot of money before I would
give up the convenience of epublishing.
9) What
Works In Progress are brewing? Any
target dates for publication? I am about to turn over the fourth
Dog book “The Dog Who Ate The Drawing” to my editor (Faith, of course). I’m
excited about the book because it is about a search for a gold mine and people
like treasure hunts. I have already been making notes for the fifth book which
will be Elephant and the sixth which will be Flintlock.
10) How
can fans reach you?
Website is edwardjcoburn.com
Blog for the dog books is http://dogwhoate.blogspot.com/
Blog for The Last Killer Standing
is http://lastkillerstanding.blogspot.com/
Twitter is https://twitter.com/Edwardjcoburn
Facebook is https://www.facebook.com/#!/ed.coburn.77
Email is authorof22@yahoo.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)